Thursday, October 11, 2012

Extraction of caffeine from tea leaves

Objectives:

1. To isolate caffeine from tea by solid-liquid and liquid-liquid extraction

2. To purify the product by sublimation

Introduction:

The components of tea leave include protein, polysaccharide, pigments and amino acids (3-5%), caffeine (2-3.5%), polyphenols (catechin and tannin), carbohydrate, gallic acid, ash and small amount of saponins. In this experiment, both solid-liquid extraction and liquid-liquid extraction methods are being used to isolate caffeine from tea leaves. Solid-liquid extraction is used to separate the components that present in the tea leaves. Liquid-liquid extraction is used to isolate caffeine alone from the other components of tea leave.

In solid-liquid extraction, tannin, pigment, glucose, amino acid, protein and saponin will be extracted along with caffeine in the aqueous. Hence, pure caffeine is preferentially to be extracted through liquid-liquid extraction. Figure 1 shows the molecular structure of caffeine.

image

Figure 1 Structure of caffeine or known as 1,3,7-trimethyl-2,6-purinedione

Apparatus:

Erlenmeyer flask, filter paper, separatory funnel, Hirsch funnel

Materials:

Tea leaves, calcium carbonate, cotton wool, magnesium sulphate anhydrous, petroleum ether, dichloromethane, sodium chloride

Instruments:

IR spectroscopy, gas chromatography-mass spectrometer

Procedures:

Isolation of caffeine and Purification of Caffeine by Sublimation

image

Results and calculations:

Table 1: Weight of crude caffeine

Weight of teas

20.0108g

Weight of empty round bottom flask

113.2919g

Weight of (round bottom flask + crude caffeine)

113.4313g

Weight of crude caffeine

0.1394g

Percentage yield = Mass of crude caffeine / mass of tea leaves x 100%

= 0.1394g / 20.0108g x 100%

= 0.70%

Table 2: Weight of pure caffeine

Weight of filter paper

0.7936g

Weight of petri dish

49.9900g

Weight of filter paper + petri dish + caffeine

50.7857g

Weight of pure caffeine

0.0021g

Recovery percentage of pure caffeine

= Mass of purified caffeine / mass of crude caffeine x 100%

= 0.0021g/ 0.1394g x 100%

= 1.51%

Table 3: Comparison of significant stretches between and standard caffeine and isolated caffeine

Sources

Standard caffeine

Isolated caffeine

Journal (Paradkar & Irudayaraj, n.d.)

Significant stretches

Wavenumber, v (cm-1)

C=O stretch

1701

1701

1705

C=C stretch

1663

1663

1659

C=N stretch

1546

-

1596

C-N stretch

1357

-

1369

Discussion:

Low molecular weight of tannin is soluble in organic solvent and it makes isolation of caffeine more difficult. Tannin contains hydroxyl group that can form ester bond with gallic acid in which the ester bond can be easily cleaved. Figure 2 shows the ester bond between tannin and gallic acid.

image

Figure 2 Structure of hydrolysable tannin.

Initially, some calcium carbonate was added into the tea leave and then the mixture was boiled in the water during solid-liquid extraction. Calcium carbonate was used to hydrolyze tannin to produce glucose and calcium salt of gallic acid in which they are not soluble in organic layer due to their high polarity. At the same time, the base also converted caffeine to a free base which is more soluble in organic layer.

In liquid-liquid extraction, methylene chloride (dichloromethane) was used as the organic solvent to isolate caffeine from the aqueous layer. Methylene chloride (1.33 g/cm3) is denser than water so it appears at the lower layer while upper layer is aqueous layer. Magnesium sulphate anhydrous, a drying agent was used to remove all the water molecules that possible present in the organic layer. Rota-vapor was used to evaporate all the solvent and the crude caffeine was collected.

Crude caffeine was purified by using sublimation in order to isolate a pure caffeine compound. The sublimated caffeine was cooled down and formed crystal compound on the filter paper.

From the infrared spectrum of standard caffeine, the significant stretches are 1701cm-1 (C=O stretch), 1663cm-1 (C=C stretch), 1546cm-1 (C=N stretch) and 1357cm-1 (C-N stretch). Compared to the spectrum of isolated caffeine, only two significant peaks are shown which is 1663cm-1 (C=C stretch) and 1701cm-1 (C=O stretch). This might be due to the intensity of isolated caffeine is very low.

Precaution steps:

1. Methylene chloride is toxic and a possible carcinogen. Minimize the exposure to its vapors by using it in fume hood.

2. Do not use separatory funnel point to anybody when releasing the vapour.

 

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Isolation and Characterization of Eugenol from Cloves

Objectives:

1. To isolate eugenol and neutral product from cloves by using steam distillation

2. To characterize eugenol and natural product by gas chromatography spectroscopy (GC-MS) and IR spectroscopy

Introduction:

Eugenol, C10H12O2 is a one of the compound of phenylpropanoid family. It is a pale yellow oily compound that extracted from essential oil especially from cloves and bay leaf.

clip_image002[5]

Figure 1 Molecular structure of eugenol

In this experiment, the eugenol(essential oil) and neutral product are isolated from cloves by using the technique of co-distillation with water, this process is also known as steam distillation. Both eugenol and neutral product are separated from water by acid-base extraction. The characterization of eugenol and neutral product are performed by using IR spectroscopy and gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy (GC-MS).

Apparatus:

Glassware and retort stands for steam distillation, distillation flask, mortar and pestle, round bottom flask, separatory funnel, Erlenmeyer flask, heating mantle

Materials:

Cloves, tert-butyl methyl ether (BME), 6M HCl, 3% NaOH, saturated NaCl, pH paper, magnesium sulphate anhydrous

Instruments:

IR spectroscopy, gas chromatography-mass spectrometer

Procedures:

clip_image004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results and calculations:

Table 1: Weight of neutral product and eugenol

Weight of round bottom flask I

98.2705g

Weight of round bottom flask I + neutral compound

98.2862g

Weight of neutral product

0.0157g

Weight of round bottom flask II

61.2657g

Weight of round bottom flask II + eugenol

61.5005g

Weight of eugenol

0.2348g

Weight of cloves = 10.0000g

Percentage yield of neutral product (terpene) = 0.0157g / 10g x 100%

= 0.157%

Percentage yield of eugenol = 0.2348g / 10g x 100%

= 2.348%

Table 2: Significant stretches of standard and extracted eugenol and their respective values

Sources

Expected values (from table)

Extracted eugenol

Standard eugenol

Journal

(Rahimi, Ashnagar, & Nikoei, 2012)

Significant stretches

Wavenumber, v

O-H stretch

3200-3600cm-1

3516.0cm-1

3429.0cm-1

3514.3cm-1

C=C stretch

1620-1680cm-1

1637cm-1

1638.0cm-1

1637.6cm-1

Aromatic C=C stretch

1400-1600cm-1

1612.0cm-1, 1513.0cm-1,

1464.0cm-1

1604.0cm-1, 1514.0cm-1, 1465.0cm-1

1608.0cm-1, 1513.8cm-1, 1459.5cm-1

C-O stretch

1100-1300cm-1

1268.0cm-1, 1235.0cm-1

1267.0cm-1, 1234.0cm-1

1268.8cm-1,

1234.2cm-1

Table 3: Significant stretch of terpene and the respective value

Significant stretches

Wavenumber, v

C=C stretch

1638cm-1

Table 4: Retention time at each significant peak in GC-MS spectrum

Source

Standard eugenol

Isolated eugenol

Retention time (minute)

4.579

4.581

Discussion:

The amount of eugenol and neutral product obtained experimentally are 0.2348g and 0.0157g respectively. The composition contributed by eugenol is 2.348% whereas neutral product (usually is terpene) gives 0.157% of yield.

When the clove exposed to steam, the volatile terpene evaporated and condensed in the distillate. In the steam distillation process, both eugenol and terpene were obtained in the distillate. In order to separate the both compounds from others, tert­-butyl methyl ether (BME) was used in the separation. The aqueous layer was appears at upper layer while organic layer at lower layer since BME is less dense than water. The organic layer only contains eugenol and neutral product after the extraction with BME.

In order to isolate eugenol from the extract, sodium hydroxide was introduced to convert eugenol to form a sodium salt as shown in the following diagram.

clip_image006[4]

Diagram 2 Sodium salt of eugenol

The sodium salt dissolved in the aqueous layer and hence eugenol was separated from the terpene in organic layer. The organic layer was partitioned and BME was removed by using rota-vapor and hence terpene was extracted.

For aqueous layer, concentrated hydrochloric acid was introduced to protonate sodium salt to form eugenol. A cloudy solution was formed during the addition of hydrochloric acid. This is because the eugenol formed from the acidification did not dissolve in aqueous layer. Finally, eugenol was extracted by using BME and the organic solvent was removed.

Magnesium sulphate anhydrous, a drying agent was used to remove all the water in the organic layer. Water in the organic compound could reduce its purity and hence the analytical characterization will be affected especially in IR spectroscopy and gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy.

From the IR spectrum of standard eugenol, the wavenumber shows: 3516cm-1 (O-H stretch), 1637cm-1 (C=C stretch), 1612cm-1, 1513cm-1, 1465cm-1 (aromatic C=C stretch), 1267cm-1, 1234cm-1 (C-O stretch). Compared to extracted eugenol, the spectrum showed: 3429cm-1(O-H stretch), 1638cm-1 (C=C stretch), 1604cm-1, 1514cm-1, and 1464cm-1 (aromatic C=C stretch), 1268cm-1, 1235cm-1 (C-O stretch).

Based on the GC-MS spectrum, standard eugenol shows the significant peak at retention time of 4.579 minute whereas isolated eugenol shows the important peak at retention time of 4.581 minute. Both isolated and pure eugenol shows the same retention time which indicates eugenol can be extracted from cloves.

Precaution steps:

1. Do not use separatory funnel point to anybody when releasing the vapour.

 

 

Monday, September 17, 2012

Polarity of organic solvents

Based on what I observed in these years, I realized that not much people know how to differentiate the polarity of solvent. So, today I’m going to share the information about the polarity of each solvent by arranging them from most non polar to most polar solvent. Basically, I chose the most common solvents that present in the laboratory.

 

Alkane < Ether < Ester < Amine < Aldehyde = Ketone < Alcohol < Carboxylic acid < Amide

Monday, August 27, 2012

Nomenclature and empirical formula of Nylon polymer

1. Write the equation involved in the above synthesis, its chemical name and industrial name.

clip_image002

Chemical name: Poly(hexamethylene sebacamide)

Industrial name: Nylon 6,10

2. Write the equations involved in the synthesis of Nylon-11 and Nylon 6,6.

clip_image004
Synthesis of Nylon 6,6

 

 

n[H2N-(CH2)10-COOH] à -[HN-(CH2)10-CO-]n-

Synthesis of Nylon 11

 

Monday, July 16, 2012

Determination of the amount of oil and grease in kitchen water

Objective:

1. To determine the amount of oil and grease present in the kitchen water

2. To determine the amount of impurities in distilled water

Introduction:

Oil and grease are defined as the organic constitutuents in produced water in which includes dispersed droplets of crude oil, dissolved carboxylate material, dissolved aromatic compounds and residual treating chemicals. Oil and grease in produced water which is discharged along with oil is not defined as a chemical substance. Instead, it is might be the oil droplets emulsion that dispersed in the water.

Dissolved and emulsified oil and grease is extracted from water by intimate contact with an extracting solvent. Some sample are extractable, especially unsaturated fats and fatty acid, oxidize readily, hence special precautions regarding temperature and solvent vapor displacement are included to minimize this effect. Organic solvent shaken with some samples may form an emulsion that is very difficult to break. This method includes a means for handling such emulsions.

Oil concentrations in water are usually reported as a mass or volume unit in a given volume of water, either as milligrams per litre (mg/l) or microlitres per litre (µl/l). Each analytical method measures a property of oil that can be related to this mass or volume value. The problem is that the composition of oil in produced water varies for a number of reasons, such as changes of source due to opening and closing wells, level of separation treatment and use of treating chemicals.

Materials:

Hydrochloric acid (HCl), trichlorotriflouroethane, n-hexane, methyl-tert-butyl ether

Apparatus:

Separatory funnel, distilling flask, liquid funnel, filter funnel, filter paper, water bath, vacuum pump, distilling adapter with drip tip, ice bath, dessicator, waste receptacle

Procedure:

1. Kitchen water was taken.

2. Tap water was added to kitchen water.

3. 1:1 HCl was added.

4. The mixture was transferred to separatory funnel.

5. n-hexane was added.

6. The mixture was shaken.

7. The upper layer was transferred to a clean conical flask and the lower layer was extracted with hexane.

8. The upper layer was transferred to the same conical flask.

9. Sodium sulphate anhydrous was added to the conical flask.

10. The empty distilling flask was weighed.

11. The distilling flask was distilled at 63-69 °C.

12. The distilling flask was cooled to room temperature before dessicator.

13. The distilling flask was weighed.

14. The procedures were repeated by using distilled water.

 

Results and calculations:

Weight of beaker + weight of distilling flask = 191.5529g

Weight of beaker + weight of distilling flask + weight of distilled water residue = 191.5698g

Weight of distilled water residue = 0.0169g

Weight of beaker + weight of distilling flask = 203.4712g

Weight of beaker + weight of distilling flask + weight of kitchen oil residue = 204.2424g

Weight of kitchen oil residue = 0.7712g

 

Mg oil and grease/ L = (A-B) / (mL sample/1000)

Mg oil and grease/ L = (A-B) x 1000/ mL sample

 

A: Gross weight of residue, mg

B: Gross weight of blank determination, mg

Mg blank residue/ L = (C-D)/ (mL sample/1000)

Mg blank residue/ L = (C-D) x 1000/ mL sample

C: weight of distilling flask + weight of residue, mg

D: weight of empty distilling flask, mg

 

Mg blank residue/ L = (C-D) x 1000 / mL sample

= (191569.8 mg – 191552.9 mg) x 1000 / 200

= 84.5 mg/ L

 

Mg oil and grease/ L = (A-B) x 1000/ mL sample

= (771.2 – 16.9) x 1000/ 50

= 15086mg / L

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS)

Objective:

1. To understand the basic operation the atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS)

2. To determine the main factors that can affect the absorption’s ability of AAS

Results:

Part A

Table 1 Absorbance of standard solution with different concentration

Concentration of standard solution of Ca2+ (mg dm-3)

Absorbance

1.0

0.045

2.0

0.079

3.0

0.114

4.0

0.148

A graph of Ca2+ absorbance vs concentration of Ca2+ was plotted.

clip_image002

Part B

Table 2 Absorbance of calcium solution when different concentration of aluminium chloride solution added

Volume of AlCl3 added (cm3)

Concentration of Al3+

(g dm-3)

Absorbance of Ca2+

0.0

0.00

1.301

0.5

0.03

0.121

1.0

0.06

0.015

2.0

0.12

0.101

5.0

0.30

0.094

10.0

0.60

0.065

20.0

1.20

0.067

A graph of Ca2+ absorbance vs concentration of Al3+ was plotted (Graph 2).

clip_image004

Part B (II)

Table 3 Absorbance of calcium solution when different concentration of aluminium nitrate solution added

Volume of Al(NO3)3 added (cm3)

Concentration of Al3+

(g dm-3)

Absorbance of Ca2+

0.0

0.00

0.821

0.5

0.01

0.594

1.0

0.02

0.267

2.0

0.04

0.053

5.0

0.10

0.011

10.0

0.20

0.002

20.0

0.40

– 0.001

A graph of Ca2+ absorbance vs concentration of Al3+ was plotted (Graph 3).

clip_image006

Part B (III)

Table 4 Absorbance of calcium solution when different concentration of potassium chloride solution added with the presence of aluminium chloride

Volume of KCl added (cm3)

Concentration of KCl

(mol dm-3)

Absorbance of Ca2+

0.0

0.000

0.400

0.5

0.001

0.691

1.0

0.002

0.671

2.0

0.004

0.593

5.0

0.010

0.395

10.0

0.020

0.084

15.0

0.030

0.037

A graph of Ca2+ absorbance vs concentration of KCl was plotted (Graph 4).

clip_image008

Friday, June 22, 2012

Thin Layer Chromatography Technique

Objective:

1. To learn the separation technique by using thin layer chromatography plate in separating a mixture of compounds into individual pure compound

2. To separate the components of maker ink

3. To separate the components of food dye

4. To separate the pigments that present in the spinach via thin later chromatography

Introduction:

The name called chromatography stems from an experiment in which a mixture of coloured (chroma) compounds from a plant extract was separated on paper so that the individual colours were written (graphy) for all to see. Chromatography is one of the most important techniques used in chemistry. It is used to purify desired products from contaminating reaction by products and to isolate biologically active compounds like new drugs from natural sources. Chromatography is also used in chemical analysis. Some examples are the detection of pesticide residues in food, soil and water, prohibited drugs in the blood of athletes and drivers and inorganic ions like nitrate and nitrite whose presence in natural waters can lead to toxic algal blooms.

Chromatography is a common laboratory technique to separate and analyze two or more analytes in the mixture by distribution of two phases: a stationary phase and a mobile phase. The stationary phase is a phase which allows the mobile phase to travel along. These two phases can be solid-liquid, liquid-liquid or gas liquid. This method works on the principle that different compounds with different solubilities and adsorptions to the two phases which they are to be partitioned. The stationary phase bonds to compounds by weak reversible intermolecular interactions (eg. electrostatic, Van der Waals interactions or hydrogen bonding) but most importantly, the strengths of these bonds depend on the structure and polarity of the individual compounds. This is means that when there is a competition between compounds and the bonding sites on the stationary phase some of the compounds will be held more strongly than others.

The compounds in the mobile phase will have different interaction with the polar stationary phase. The factors are mainly depends on the polarity of adsorbent (silica gel in this experiment), solvent polarities, and functional groups of the compounds. The polar adsorbent will more strongly attract the polar molecules of compounds and it will have lower affinity to the non-polar compounds. Hence, the movement of compounds with different polarities could be different. In addition, the polarity of solvent is very important to the compound separations, a solvent system may increase in its polarity by changing the composition of the solvent mixture. The more polar the solvent, the faster the compounds can be drawn up, which means the further the compounds move. The comparison of the polarities of solvent are listed down in the diagram 1.

image

Diagram 1

The second factor that affects the interaction between stationary phase and compounds is functional group of each compound. The highly polar groups in compound will cause the stronger adsorption and eluted less readily to the stationary phase compared to less polar compounds. Hence, the highly polar compounds will tend to interact strongly with the polar adsorbents and absorb onto the fine particles of the absorbent, hence it travel slowly. The adsorption strengths of each compound having the following types of functional groups in the order of increasing group polarities.

image

However, the variation may take place which depends on the overall structure of each compound.

In a typical procedure, a mixture of compounds is applied to one end of a plate or column of stationary phase. Then a mobile phase which can carry the compounds in the mixture is allowed to run over or through stationary phase, starting from the end at which the compounds were applied and going to other. As the mobile phase runs, the compounds with strongest bonds to the stationary phase continually displace the others which are then carried further up the chromatography. Consequently, the most weakly bonded molecules end up furthest along the plate and as times goes on, the individual compounds are all separated from each other.

In this experiment, the mixture of the compounds are applied to the bottom of plate or sheet which holding a thin layer of the stationary phase. The mobile phase is allowed to move along the plate by capillary action to develop the chromatography. The compounds are visualized and marked on the plate. In order to visualize the compounds, ordinary visible light is used for coloured compounds, UV light is used for compounds that contain double bonds, and the certain reagent (iodine) is used to react with the separated compounds to produce coloured spots.

Finally, the position of each spot on the plate is measured and reported as the retention factor (or retardation factor), Rf value. Retention factor is the ratio of distance traveled of the compound to the distance of the solvent traveled. Retention factor, Rf is the distance of compound traveled divided by the total distance of solvent travelled in TLC plate. The Rf value are important because they are a consistent property of a compound so long as the stationary and mobile phases are identical. The Rf value can assist in identifying a compound. If two spots travel the same distance on the TLC plate or they have the same retention factor, then both compounds might be concluded as the identical compound.

image

Materials:

Commercial felt tipped writing pen, spinach, sand, chloroform (CH2Cl2), methanol (CH3OH), petroleum spirit, ethanol (CH3CH2OH), 2M ammonia solution, 1-butanol (C8H10OH), acetone

Apparatus:

Capillary tubes, mortar and pestle, Merck TLC plate, Whatman 12.5cm filter paper, Pasteur pipette, ultra-violet light (long wave length and short wave length)

Procedure:

Part I: Separation of inks from a commercial felt tipped writing pen

Prepare the developing tank

1. 6ml of 1-butanol, 2ml of ethanol and 2ml of 2M ammonia solution were prepared into two 150cm3 beakers.

2. A filter paper was inserted into each beaker and the solution was swirled to wet the paper.

3. Each beaker was covered by a watch glass.

Spot the plate

1. 8.5cm x 3cm of chromatography paper (Whatman SG 81) and 10cm x 3.5cm TLC plate were obtained which can fit inside the developing tank without touching the watch glass.

2. For filter paper and TLC plate, two dots with 1cm apart and 1.2cm from the bottom edge were made by pencil. The dots were labeled as “1” and “2”. The sample (marker ink 500) was spotted on the spot marked “1” once and three times on the spot marked “2”.

3. Steps 1 and 2 were repeated by using marker ink 500A and food dye (red).

Develop the chromatogram

1. The chromatography paper and TLC plate were placed into the different developing tank and make sure that the spots are above the solvent level.

2. The beakers were covered with glass watch.

3. The solvent was allowed to travel upwards.

4. The filter paper and TLC plate were removed and the maximum height of the eluent reached was marked with pencil.

Record the result

1. An accurate drawing was made to show the identity of the sample, the type of stationary phase, the mobile phase, the colour of each discernible spot, the method of visualization and the Rf value for each compound.

Part II: Separation of spinach leaf pigments by TLC

Prepare the developing tank

1. 10ml mobile phase was prepared from the mixture of 9.5ml CH2Cl2 and 0.5ml CH3OH.

2. The mixture was poured into a 150cm3 developing tank.

3. A filter paper was inserted and the mobile phase was swirled to wet the filter paper.

4. The beaker was covered by a watch glass.

Extraction procedure

1. 10g of spinach was grinded by using a mortar and pestle with a portion of sand as extra abrading agent.

2. 20ml of acetone was added and the sample was grinding until the extract is green and the spinach is completely pulped.

3. 10ml petroleum spirit was added and it was mixed quickly with the sample by using pestle.

4. A Pasteur pipette was used to transfer 5ml of the liquid part of the mixture into a 10cm3 glass vial.

5. The vial was capped immediately.

Spot the plate

1. A 1.5cm x 6.6cm TLC plate was used and a dot was made by using a pencil from 1.2cm from the bottom.

2. The green layer of spinach was spotted on the plate several times.

Develop the chromatogram

1. The TLC plate was placed into the developing tank.

2. The solvent front was marked.

Record the result

1. The plate was observed under UV light and the observation was recorded.

2. Accurate drawing of TLC obtained was drawn to show the identity of the sample, the type of stationary phase, the mobile phase, the colour of each discernible spot, the method of visualization and the Rf value for each compound.

Results and calculations:

Based on the formula below to calcuate the retention factor of each component in the sample.

image

Rf is refers to the retention factor.

Observation:

image

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

image

Observation:

image

Material used

Thin layer chromatogram (TLC) plate (10cm x 3cm)

Filter paper (8.5cm x 3cm)

Distance of solvent travelled

-

-

Observation:

image

image

Observation:

image

Material used

Thin layer chromatogram (TLC) plate (10cm x 3cm)

Distance of solvent travelled

8.5cm

Rf value of 1st spot

0.09

Rf value of 2nd spot

0.15

Rf value of 3rd spot

0.31

Rf value of 4th spot

0.49

Number of spot

Rf value

Colour observed

1st spot

0.09

Yellow

2nd spot

0.15

Yellow

3rd spot

0.31

Yellow

4th spot

0.49

Green

Discussion:

In the thin layer chromatography, the eluent (solvent) is prepared by using a mixture of 1-butanol, ethanol and ammonia solution in the ratio of 6:2:2. The polarity of the particular solvent cannot be too low because the polar compounds will not be able to carry by the eluent and will not be separated, so that the separation might not be observable. If the solvent of too high polarity is used, the polar compound will travel so fast that the separation between non-polar compound and polar compound to become so small and poor separation will be observed. The solvent mixture is believed that it has the optimized solubility for the organic compounds to dissolve in the solvent. In another word, the compounds can be easily to be carried by the solvent in the TLC plate and filter paper. Before the plate is placed into the solvent, a filter paper was dipped inside the solvent in a beaker which is covered by an evaporating flask. This is to create a system that full with the vapours of organic solvent and hence the solvent is allowed to travel up along the plate faster. After the plate was introduced into the solvent, the solvent start to migrate itself and the compounds move along with solvent until the solvent front has been reached.

There are three components in the chromatography study in which includes the TLC plate with adsorbent or filter paper, the development solvent and the organic compounds that to be analyzed. The adsorbent, silica gel consists of a three dimensional network of thousands of alternating silicon and oxygen bonds. It is a very polar and is capable of hydrogen bonding due to its partial positive charge in silicon and partial negative in oxygen. The silica gel with compete with the development solvent for the organic compounds as the solvent is traveling up through the TLC plate. The silica gel tends to bind the compounds (on stationary phase) while the development solvent tried to dissolve the compounds (on mobile phase) in order to carry the compounds along the plate as the solvent travels up. All the compounds are possible to be adsorbed into the stationary phase however the time of adsorption of compounds in the particular phase is depends on the polarity of each compound. The more polar the compound is, the longer the time taken that the compound adsorbed into the stationary phase so it eluting speed is slower (more time on stationary phase). Less polar compounds are weakly adsorbed, so the time taken for less polar compounds to be adsorbed on stationary phase is shorter. As a result, the less polar compounds can travel further along the plate compared to the more polar compounds. In the paper chromatography, the organic compounds also tend to move upward and the mobile phase carries the organic compounds to run over or through the stationary phase. However, the paper chromatography might not be suitable for some compounds since the compound separation is not good enough in certain case.

In the first part, the food dye (red colour), marker ink 500, and marker ink 500A were used in the study of the chromatography. In the chromatogram a, the food dye were applied one time and three times separately in two different spots (marked as 1 and 2 respectively). The result obtained showed that the distances of each component in food dye moved are almost identical in the TLC plate. This proved that the number of sample spotted on the plate did not affect the distance of each component in food dye travelled in TLC plate. However, the separation of compound in filter paper was not good. This is because there are only three spots appeared on the filter paper (which is shown in chromatogram b) while TLC plate has four single component. In chromatogram c and chromatogram d, there is no spot being observed in both chromatograms. This might be due to the low polarity of sample ink marker 500 in which the low polar organic compounds cannot move in either TLC plate or filter paper. By comparing the chromatogram e and chromatogram f, both chromatograms have one similarity in which they showed that only one component present in the ink marker 500A. Two spots (one spot is being spotted once and another one spot is being spotted three times) in both chromatograms shows the similar Rf value and hence two compounds can be concluded to they migrated the same distance in each chromatogram.

In the second part of the experiment, the spinach was being applied on a TLC plate. The TLC plate showed there are total four components in spinach. The Rf value of the first spot, second spot, third spot, and forth spot are 0.09, 0.15, 0.31, and 0.49 respectively. The colours of each spot in the TLC plate have been recorded, which the compounds with Rf value of 0.09, 0.15 and 0.31 showed yellow colour while the forth spot showed green colour. The yellow spot are predicted as the xanthophylls while the green spot is predicted as chlorophyll. Xanthophylls and chlorophylls are the pigments that usually can be found in the plant

Safety concerns:

1. Always wear goggles and gloves.

2. Handle and dispose the mobile phase into the waste bottle.

3. Do not shake or disturb the mobile phase after TLC plate has been introduced into the beaker.

Monday, June 11, 2012

Solubility Equilibrium

Objective:

1. To study the thermodynamics of solubility of naphthalene in dipheylamine

2. To determine the molal freezing point depression constant of naphthalene

Introduction:

Solubility is the ability of a substance to dissolve in water. The solubility is measured in terms of concentration of an ion that is present in a smaller ratio in solution. On the other hand, solubility equilibrium refers to the equilibrium between the dissolved salt (ions) and undissolved salt that usually exists in a saturated solution or a solution of a sparingly soluble salt.

Naphthalene (pure solid) Naphthalene (solution, mole fraction on X)

The reaction we shall study is the solubility of naphthalene, C10H8 in diphenylamine, C12H11N, which can be written as the equation shown above. For a saturated solution, the equilibrium constant for this reaction is

K =

Since the activity of a pure solid is unity, so

aNaphthalene (solid)= 1

Assuming that the solution is ideal solution, the activity of naphthalene in the solution is equals to its mole fraction in which aNaphthalene (solution) = X. Therefore, the equilibrium constant is K =X. By the argument of the preceding section, we should predict that the temperature dependence of this solubility equilibrium would be:

= =- [ - ]

The temperature dependence of this equilibrium if found by determining the temperature at which naphthalene first precipitates from liquid mixtures of naphthalene and diphenylamine. This is the temperature at which the mole fraction X in naphthalene solution is saturated with naphthalene. We are predicting that a plot of log X will be a straight line of slope – Δ H° / 2.303 R.

The enthalpy change for the first step is obviously the enthalpy of fusion of naphthalene. Since we are assuming that the solutions are ideal, the enthalpy change for the second step is zero (this is the definition of an ideal solution). Thus the enthalpy change for the overall reaction, Δ H° is equals to the enthalpy of fusion of naphthalene,

Δ H°fus we then have a second prediction to check; if we can obtain Δ H° from the temperature dependence data, it should be equal to the directly measured value of Δ H°fus for naphthalene.

It is also very interesting to see what the phase rule indicates about the system we shall study. We have two components and two phases. The number of degrees of freedom is expressed in the term as F = C - P + 2, where F is the variance or the number of degrees of freedom which is able to be varied while the number of phases may remain constant, C is the number of components in the present system, and P is the number of phases present. In this case, F = 2-2+2 = 2, of which one is used up because the pressure in the laboratory does not change. Thus, for any particular composition of the liquid solution, there is only one temperature at which the solid phase and the liquid phase can be in equilibrium since the choice of liquid composition has used up the remaining degree of freedom.

When a solution of liquid cools, the temperature drops almost linearly with time until the point is reached where the solution is saturated with respect to each other. This component then begins to form precipitation and the rate of cooling of the sample changes. If the temperature of such a solution is plotted as a function of time, a plot called a cooling curve is obtained. The intersection point of the straight line extrapolations of the two portions of the cooling curve is a very good estimation of the temperature in which the solid should first begin to appear ideally.

Materials:

Naphthalene, diphenylamine

Apparatus:

Pyrex test tube, thermometer, stopwatch, conical flask, weighing balance, magnetic stirring bar, water bath

Procedure:

1. 1.00g of naphthalene was placed into a pyrex test tube and was heated in a 90°C water bath until all the naphthalene was melted.

2. The test tube was removed and was wiped dry followed by placing it in a conical flask. A thermometer was placed into the molten naphthalene and was stirred while taking temperature reading every 10 or 30 seconds until the naphthalene solidified.

3. The diphenylamine was weighed accurately and was added into naphthalene in which the mixture is about 0.8 mole fractions in naphthalene.

4. The mixture was heated in water bath until it is completely melted.

5. The test tube was removed from water bath and processed as before.

6. The temperature at which the solid appears was recorded.

7. The procedure was repeated for second third and fourth addition of diphenylamine such that the mole fractions of naphthalene are about 0.6, 0.4 and 0.2.

Results and calculations:

Pure naphthalene

Number of mole of pure naphthalene = 1.00g / 128.17 g mol-1

= 7.802 x 10-3 mol

First addition of diphenylamine - 0.8 naphthalene/ diphenylamine mixture

Let X be amount of diphenylamine in naphthalene/ diphenylamine mixture

Number of mole of naphthalene = 1.00g / 128.17 g mol-1

= 7.802 x 10-3 mol

0.8 = 7.802 x 10-3 mol / {7.802 x 10-3 mol + (X/169.23 g mol-1)}

X = 0.33g

Thus, the amount of diphenylamine added to pure naphthalene is 0.33g in order to produce a 0.8 mole fraction of naphthalene in the mixture.

Second addition of diphenylamine - 0.6 naphthalene/ diphenylamine mixture

Let X be amount of diphenylamine in naphthalene/ diphenylamine mixture

Number of mole of naphthalene = 1.00g / 128.17 g mol-1

= 7.802 x 10-3 mol

0.6 = 7.802 x 10-3 mol / {7.802 x 10-3 mol + (X/169.23 g mol-1)}

X = 0.88g

Total amount of diphenylamine present in the mixture is 0.88g, since 0.33g of diphenylamine was added previously, hence

0.88g – 0.33g = 0.55g

Therefore, the amount of diphenylamine added to the mixture is 0.55g in order to produce a 0.6 mole fraction of naphthalene in the mixture.

Third addition of diphenylamine - 0.4 naphthalene/ diphenylamine mixture

Let X be amount of diphenylamine in naphthalene/ diphenylamine mixture

Number of mole of naphthalene = 1.00g / 128.17 g mol-1

= 7.802 x 10-3 mol

0.4 = 7.802 x 10-3 mol / {7.802 x 10-3 mol + (X/169.23 g mol-1)}

X = 1.98g

Total amount of diphenylamine present in the mixture is 1.98g, since 0.88g of diphenylamine was added previously, hence

1.98g – 0.88g = 1.10g

Therefore, the additional amount of diphenylamine required is 1.10g in order to produce a 0.4 mole fraction of naphthalene in the mixture.

Forth addition of diphenylamine - 0.2 naphthalene/ diphenylamine mixture

Let X be amount of diphenylamine in naphthalene/ diphenylamine mixture

Number of mole of naphthalene = 1.00g / 128.17 g mol-1

= 7.802 x 10-3 mol

0.2 = 7.802 x 10-3 mol / {7.802 x 10-3 mol + (X/169.23 g mol-1)}

X = 5.28g

Total amount of diphenylamine present in the mixture is 5.28g, since 1.98g of diphenylamine was added previously, hence

5.28g – 1.98g = 3.30g

Therefore, the additional amount of diphenylamine required is 3.30g in order to produce a 0.2 mole fraction of naphthalene in the mixture.

Table 1 Summary of the amount of diphenylamine added

Mole fraction of naphthalene in mixture

Sequence of addition

Amount of diphenylamine added (g)

1.0

-

0.00

0.8

First addition

0.33

0.6

Second addition

0.55

0.4

Third addition

1.10

0.2

Forth addition

3.30

Table 2 Temperature of naphthalene/ diphenylamine solution with different mole fractions at 10 seconds intervals

Let Xnaphthalene be the mole fraction of naphthalene

image

Note: The highlight column represents the temperature in which the solution started to solidify.

Table 3 Table 2 Temperature of naphthalene/diphenylamine solution with different mole fractions at 30 seconds intervals

Let Xnaphthalene be the mole fraction of naphthalene

image

Note: The highlight column represents the temperature in which the solution started to solidify.

Graph 1 Cooling curve of pure naphthalene

image

Graph 2 Cooling curve of 0.8 mole fraction of naphthalene

image

Graph 3 Cooling curve of naphthalene with 0.6 mole fraction

image

Graph 4 Cooling curve of naphthalene with 0.4 mole fraction

image

Graph 5 Cooling curve of 0.2 mole fraction of naphthalene

image

From Graph 1 to Graph 5, the freezing point of each solution has been summarized in the table below.

Table 4 Freezing point of naphthalene with different mole fraction

Mole fraction of naphthalene, Xnaphthalene

 

Freezing point, T (°C)

1.0

80.0

0.8

65.0

0.6

52.0

0.4

32.5

0.2

42.0

Table 5 and 1/T

Mole fraction of naphthalene, Xnaphthalene

 

Log X

Freezing point, T (K)

1/T

1.0

0.000

353.0

0.00283

0.8

-0.097

338.0

0.00296

0.6

-0.222

325.0

0.00308

0.4

-0.398

305.5

0.00327

0.2

-0.699

315.0

0.00317

From Graph 6, the gradient obtained is -911.1.

image

The solution is assumed to be ideal solution, so the enthalpy change, is equals to the enthalpy of fusion of naphthalene, .

The relationship between free Gibbs energy, enthalpy and entropy is as follow:

image

Compared the enthalpy and entropy of naphthalene obtained, the theoretical value of enthalpy and entropy are +18.8kJ mol-1 and +53J mol-1 K-1. The difference between theoretical and experimental value is small, because some of the heat was lost to the surrounding environment.

To find out the molal freezing point depression constant for naphthalene, the formula below is applied:

image

Thus, the molal freezing point depression constant of naphthalene is 7.69 °C / m.

Discussion:

Freezing point depression is the phenomenon that the freezing point of pure substance falls to lower temperature due to the existence of other impurities. In the other words, the freezing temperature of a solution is lower than the freezing point of pure solvent. This is known as the colligative property of a substance. In this experiment, the diphenylamine is added as the solute into the solvent of naphthalene. The addition of diphenylamine caused the freezing point of naphthalene to go down. . When the solution freezes, the naphthalene solvent and the diphenylamine solidify separately and hence this producing a relatively ordered state. Therefore more energy must be removed to take the solution from its highly disordered liquid state to its ordered solid state than to do the same for pure naphthalene. Hence, solvents with impurities always freeze at a lower temperature than pure solvents.

The naphthalene/diphenylamine solution is not pure and hence the presence of impurities caused the arrangement to be more disordered form when compared to the pure naphthalene. When the impurities (diphenylamine) present in naphthalene, the bonding between naphthalene molecules will be disturbed. The naphthalene molecules are more difficult to form bonding with other molecule and thus the degree of disorder is higher. The bonding of each molecule in this solution is easily to be broken and formed among the molecules. So, the entropy change of naphthalene with impurities has a higher entropy change of pure naphthalene.

From the data obtained, the cooling curve of pure naphthalene showed that the freezing point of this solvent is around 80°C. The pure naphthalene was heated in the water bath at 92°C to melt. From 92°C, the temperature of this solvent kept on dropping until a constant temperature at 80°C. This is known as the freezing point of the solvent. This is because the heat of solvent released is equals to the amount of heat lost to the surrounding. That is why the temperature remained at 80°C. After the solvent is completely solidified (after freezing point), the temperature continues to decrease and stop until room temperature is reached.

For the cases of naphthalene/diphenylamine solution with different mole fraction, the same process was happen in each solution. The cooling curve in each solution showed that freezing point of the solution where the temperature remained constant. However, supercooling was occurs in the cooling process of solution with 0.4 mole fraction of naphthalene. As we can see, the temperature suddenly increased from 30.0°C to 32.5°C at 690th seconds and the temperature kept constant at 32.5°C until 780th seconds. From the observation, the solid is appears at 32.5°C instead of 30.0°C. This is due to the supercooling effect. Supercooling is a phenomenon that describes a solution do not solidify or to form solid but still remain as liquid below its freezing point. Normally, a liquid below its freezing point will crystallize in the presence of a nucleation site in which a crystal structure can form. However, lacking of any such nucleus, the liquid phase can be maintained all the way down to the temperature until crystal homogeneous nucleation occurs.

Theoretically, the freezing point depression in this experiment will be increase as the total amount of diphenylamine present in the solution increase. Based on the data obtained, the freezing point of the solution after first addition, second addition, third addition and forth addition of diphenylamine are 65.0°C, 52.0°C, 32.5°C and 42.0°C respectively. In the three former cases, diphenylamine act as the solute while naphthalene act as solvent in the solution. When the amount of diphenylamine present in the solution is large compared to naphthalene, the role of each other will be shifted. In the case of 0.2 mole fraction of naphthalene, the naphthalene act as solute while diphenylamine act as a solvent in the solution. The solid was appears at 42.0°C is because the freezing point of diphenylamine (solvent) was depressed by the presence of naphthalene (solute).

Precaution steps:

1. The solution must be kept stirred continuously to avoid supercooling effect.

2. The experiment must be performed out of the presence of moving air.

3. The reading of temperature must be taken parallel to the observer’s eyes to avoid parallex error.

4. Do not dispose naphthalene waste into sinks.

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Solvolysis of the salt of a weak acid and a weak base

Objective:

1. To determine the extent of solvolysis of ammonium borate in water by calorimeter

Results and calculation:

Part I: Mixture of sodium hydroxide, NaOH and hydrochloric acid, HCl

Table 1.1 The temperature of mixture and the time taken from beginning

Time taken from beginning, t (s)

Temperature, T (°C)

0.0

26.0

0.5

27.0

3.5

28.0

5.5

28.5

7.5

29.0

10.5

29.0

12.0

29.5

14.5

29.5

16.5

29.5

19.5

30.0

22.0

30.0

25.0

30.0

29.5

30.0

32.0

30.0

34.0

30.0

94.0

30.0

154.0

30.0

214.0

30.0

274.0

30.0

324.0

30.0

Graph 1 Temperature of mixture against time taken from beginning

image

Table 1.2 Temperature change of mixture caused by neutralization reaction
 

Initial temperature, Ti (°C)

26.0

Final temperature, Tf (°C)

30.0

Change of temperature, ΔT (°C)

4.0

 

Part II: Mixture of sodium hydroxide, NaOH and boric acid, H3BO3

Table 2.1 The temperature of mixture and the time taken from beginning

 

Time taken from beginning, t (s)

Temperature, T (°C)

0.0

26.0

5.5

27.0

8.5

28.0

13.0

28.0

14.0

28.0

15.0

28.0

24.0

28.5

32.0

29.0

44.5

29.0

58.0

29.0

62.0

29.0

69.0

29.0

129.0

29.0

189.0

29.0

249.0

29.0

309.0

29.0

369.0

29.0

Graph 2 Temperature of mixture against time taken from beginning

image

Table 2.2 Temperature change of mixture caused by neutralization reaction

Initial temperature, Ti (°C)

26.0

Final temperature, Tf (°C)

29.0

Change of temperature, ΔT (°C)

3.0

Part III: Mixture of ammonia, NH4OH and hydrochloric acid, HCl

Table 3.1 The temperature of mixture and the time taken from beginning

Time taken from beginning, t (s)

Temperature, T (°C)

0.0

25.0

2.0

26.5

5.0

27.0

6.0

28.5

8.0

29.0

10.5

29.0

12.5

29.0

15.0

29.0

17.5

29.5

20.0

29.5

23.0

29.5

26.0

30.0

29.5

30.0

33.0

30.0

39.0

30.0

99.0

30.0

159.0

30.0

219.0

30.0

279.0

30.0

339.0

30.0

Graph 3 Temperature of mixture against time taken from beginning

image

Table 3.2 Temperature change of mixture caused by neutralization reaction

Initial temperature, Ti (°C)

25.0

Final temperature, Tf (°C)

30.0

Change of temperature, ΔT (°C)

5.0

Part IV: Mixture of ammonia, NH4OH and boric acid, H3BO3

Table 4.1 The temperature of mixture and the time taken from beginning

Time taken from beginning, t (s)

Temperature, T (°C)

0.0

25.0

3.5

26.0

7.0

27.0

11.5

27.0

15.5

27.0

18.0

27.0

22.5

27.0

27.5

27.0

33.0

27.0

37.5

27.0

42.0

27.0

47.5

27.0

52.5

27.0

88.0

27.0

148.0

27.0

208.0

27.0

268.0

27.0

328.0

27.0

Graph 4 Temperature of mixture against time taken from beginning

image

Table 4.2 Temperature change of mixture caused by neutralization reaction

Initial temperature, Ti (°C)

25.0

Final temperature, Tf (°C)

27.0

Change of temperature, ΔT (°C)

2.0

 

Determination of limiting agent in each part

In the reaction for part I, the limiting agent is calculated as shown below:image image

Therefore, limiting agent in the reaction is NaOH solution.

The limiting agent in each part is determined by using the method as shown in Part I.image

Determination of heat capacity of calorimeter

From the enthalpy change, it can be expressed in the term of

-q = (msolution)(csolution)(ΔT) + (ccalorimeter )( ΔT)

-(-ΔH )(n) = (msolution)(csolution)(ΔT) + (ccalorimeter )( ΔT)

Since -ΔH = -q / n, and ΔH is negative because neutralization is an exothermic reaction.

Assumptions:

Specific heat capacity of calorimeter = 1.0 cal °C-1 g-1

Density of solution = 1g cm-3 (125ml solution = 125g solution)

Part I

In part I, the enthalpy change of a strong base and a strong acid is -13.36 kcal mol-1.

Number of moles of reaction = 0.04375 mol since limiting agent has 0.04375 mol.

Let ΔH1 be the enthalpy change of neutralization reaction of part I.

-(-ΔH1 )(n) = (msolution)(csolution)(ΔT) + (ccalorimeter )( ΔT)

-(-13.36x103 cal mol-1)(0.04375mol) = (125g)( 1.0 cal °C-1 g-1)(4°C) + (ccalorimeter )(4°C)

ccalorimeter = 21.125g °C-1

Determination of enthalpy change of each reaction

Part II

Based on part I, ccalorimeter = 21.125 cal °C-1, ΔT = 3°C

Number of moles of reaction = 0.04375 mol since limiting agent has 0.04375 mol.

Let ΔH2 be the enthalpy change of neutralization reaction of part II.

-(-ΔH2 )(n) = (msolution)(csolution)(ΔT) + (ccalorimeter )( ΔT)

-(-ΔH2)(0.04375mol) = (125g)( 1.0 cal °C-1 g-1)(3°C) + (21.125 cal °C-1)(3°C)

ΔH2 = 10.02 kcal mol-1

Since neutralization is an exothermic process, so ΔH2 = -10.02 kcal mol-1.

Part III

Based on part I, ccalorimeter = 21.125 cal °C-1, ΔT = 5°C

Number of moles of reaction = 0.04375 mol since limiting agent has 0.04375 mol.

Let ΔH3 be the enthalpy change of neutralization reaction of part III.

-(-ΔH3 )(n) = (msolution)(csolution)(ΔT) + (ccalorimeter )( ΔT)

-(- ΔH3)(0.04375mol) = (125g)( 1.0 cal °C-1 g-1)(5°C) + (21.125 cal °C-1)(5°C)

ΔH3 = 16.7 kcal mol-1

Since neutralization is an exothermic process, so ΔH3 = -16.7 kcal mol-1. However, this value is not valid due to certain error. The enthalpy change of the neutralization reaction between a weak base and a strong acid should be less than the reaction between strong acid and strong base.

Part IV

Based on part I, ccalorimeter = 21.125 cal °C-1, ΔT = 2°C

Number of moles of reaction = 0.04375 mol since limiting agent has 0.04375 mol.

Let ΔH4 be the enthalpy change of neutralization reaction of part IV.

-(-ΔH4 )(n) = (msolution)(csolution)(ΔT) + (ccalorimeter )( ΔT)

-(- ΔH4)(0.04375mol) = (125g)( 1.0 cal °C-1 g-1)(2°C) + (21.125 cal °C-1)(2°C)

ΔH4 = 6.68 kcal mol-1

Since neutralization is an exothermic process, so ΔH4 = -6.68 kcal mol-1.

Determination of enthalpy change of dissociation of H3BO3 and NH3

Assumption: The reaction between weak base and weak acid goes to completion.

By using the ΔH’s value of obtained,

ΔH4 = ΔH2 + ΔH3 – ΔH1

ΔH4 = -10.02 kcal mol-1 + (-16.7 kcal mol-1) – (-13.36kcal mol-1)

ΔH4 = -13.36 kcal mol-1

The enthalpy change of neutralization between a weak base and a weak acid is -13.36 kcal mol-1. By comparing to the value calculated, ΔH4 = -6.68 kcal mol-1 (from part IV), this value is bigger. According to the reaction between weak base and weak acid, this value is not valid because the expected value should be less than the value obtained in part I, part II and part III. Since the value of ΔH3 is not valid, therefore the value obtained by using ΔH4 = ΔH2 + ΔH3 – ΔH1 is no longer valid.

Determination of fraction of the salt ammonium borate reacts with water

Let a be the fraction of ammonium borate salt reacts with water

Ksolv = equilibrium constant of solvolysis

a = 1 – a’ = 1 – (ΔH / ΔH4)

K = a2 / (1-a)2

Based on the formula given above, the fraction of ammonium borate salt reacts with water and equilibrium constant of solvolysis were calculated in each part. image

For ΔH = -16.7 kcal mol-1, the value of fraction of the salt ammonium borate reacts with water is negative value which is -0.25. This is an invalid value. Hence, the value of equilibrium constant of solvolysis is not valid too.

Determination of the dissociation constant, Ka for boric acid

clip_image010

From the previous part, the equilibrium constant of solvolysis for part IV is 1.00, and the value of Kw = 1.0 x 10-14 and Kb = 1.75 x 10-5. Therefore, the value of Ka of boric acid is calculated as shown below:

1.00 = 1.0 x 10-14 / (Ka)(1.75 x 10-5)

Ka = 5.71 x 10-10

According to the journal article, Perelygin, Yu. P. & D. Yu. Chistyakov (2006). Boric acid. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, 79(12), 2041-2042. doi: 10.1134/S1070427206120305. (Dissociation constant of Ka is 7.3 x 10-10)

The value obtained experimentally is 5.71 x 10-10 which shows a deviation with the value of Ka obtained via journal article.

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Determination of the Conductance of Strong and Weak Electrolytes

Objective:

1. To measure the conductance of potassium chloride, hydrochloric acid, sodium chloride and sodium acetate

2. To determine the dissociation constant of acetic acid

Introduction:

An electrolyte is any substance containing free ions that make the solution to be electrically conductive. Strong electrolyte can dissociate completely in water to form ions while weak electrolyte dissociate partially in water to form its ions. The conductance of solution is depends on the degree of dissociation of electrolyte. The higher the degrees of dissociation of electrolyte, the more ions are produced in the solution, hence the better the conductivity of electrolyte. According to Ohms’ law,

E = I R

where E is the potential difference, I is the current measured and R is the resistance. The term conductance is generally used for dealing with electrolyte and this is defined as the reciprocal of the resistance of the solution. The relationship between resistance and the conductance of the solution is defined as below:

L (ohm-1 or Ω-1) = 1 / R

Once the resistance, R is known, the conductivity or specific conductance (X) may be obtained from

X (Ω-1 cm-1) = d / AR

where d is the distance separation between two electrodes of the measurement cell, A is refers to the area. The cell constant k of the conductivity cell is defined as

k = d/A

and hence

X = kL

The specific conductance, X is the reciprocal of the resistance in ohm of a 1cm of liquid at a specified temperature. The molar conductivity, Λ of an electrolyte solution is defined as:

Λ (Ω-1 mol-1 cm2) = X /C

For weak electrolyte, the increase of molar conductivity with increasing dilution is ascribed to increased dissociation of the electrolyte molecules to free ions. However, a thermodynamic equilibrium exists between the un-dissociated molecules and the ions formed from dissociation. The dissociation degree, α at the given concentration, C is given by

α = Λ / Λo

where Λo is the molar conductivity in the limit of zero concentration or limiting molar conductivity. For strong electrolytes, the molar conductivity is higher than those of weak electrolyte at high concentrations. As the solutions become dilute, the molar conductivities also increase in the case of weak electrolytes but the variation is less steep than for weak electrolytes.

Kohlrausch’s Law states that at time infinite dilution, the molar conductivity of an electrolyte can be expressed as the sum of the contribution from its individual ions.

Λo = Λ+o + Λ-o

where Λ+o and Λ-o are refers to the conductivities of cation and anion at infinite dilution. In this experiment, the molar conductivity of weak electrolyte is determined by using Kohlrausch’s Law.

image ]

Given that the molar conductivities of strong electrolyte are expressed as the following:

clip_image004

Alternatively, Λo and the dissociation constant, ka of weak electrolyte may be obtained from the Ostwald dilution law:

clip_image006

Materials:

0.2000M potassium chloride solution, 0.1000M acetic acid, 0.1000M, hydrochloric acid, 0.1000M sodium chloride solution, 0.1000M sodium acetate solution

Apparatus:

Conductivity meter, 100ml dilution flasks, pipette, burette

Procedure:

Part 1: Determination of cell constant

1. The conductance (L) of 0.2000M potassium chloride solution was measured.

2. The cell constant (k) was determined by using equation 6 with the given specific conductance (X) of this solution of 2.768x10-3 ohm-1 cm-1.

Part 2: Measurement of conductance

1. From the solution acetic acid provided, the successive solution with concentration of 0.0500M, 0.0250M, 0.0125M, 0.00312M, 0.00156M and 0.00078M solution were prepared.

2. The conductance of these solutions was measured.

3. The procedure was repeated with hydrochloric acid, sodium chloride, and sodium acetate.

4. The conductance of water used was measured.

5.

Results and calculations:

Part I Determination of Cell Constant

Conductance, L of:

KCl = 30.07 mΩ-1

Distilled water = 0.00 mΩ-1

Specific conductance, X = 2.768 × 10-3 Ω-1 cm-1

Cell constant, k = X / L

= 2.768 mΩ-1 cm-1 / 30.07 mΩ-1

= 0.09205 cm-1

Table 1 Conductance of solutions with different concentrationimage

Table 2 Specific conductance of each solution with different concentrationimage

Table 3 Molar conductivity of each solution with different concentrationimage

image

By using Kohlrausch’s law, the

image

Table 4 Degree of dissociation and dissociation constant of CH3COOH at different concentration

Concentration of CH3COOH (mol dm-3)

Degree of dissociation, α = Λ / Λo

Dissociation constant, ka of CH3COOH

0.10000

0.0189

3.64 x10-5

0.05000

0.0310

4.96 x10-5

0.02500

0.0388

3.92 x10-5

0.01250

0.0511

3.44 x10-5

0.00625

0.0622

2.58 x10-5

0.00312

0.1245

4.85 x10-5

0.00156

0.1950

7.37 x10-5

0.00078

0.2471

6.33 x10-5

*degree of dissociation is calculated by using the formula of α = Λ / Λo

*dissociation constant is calculated by using

clip_image014

Average value of dissociation constant, ka

= [(3.64 + 4.96 + 3.92 + 3.44 + 2.58 + 4.85 + 7.37 + 6.33) × 10-5] / 8

= 4.636 × 10-5

 

Table 5 1/Λ of CH3COOH with CΛ.

1 / Λ (Ω cm-2 mol)

CΛ (× 10-3 Ω-1 cm-1)

1.597

0.0626

0.971

0.0515

0.776

0.0322

0.590

0.0212

0.484

0.0129

0.242

0.0129

0.154

0.0101

0.122

0.0064

Graph of 1/Λ versus CΛ was plotted.

clip_image016

From Graph 4,

clip_image002[8]

Compared to y = mx + c

m = 1/ (ka x Λo2), c = 1 / Λo

1 / Λo = 0.013 Ω cm-2 mol

Λo = 1 / 0.013 Ω cm-2 mol

= 76.92 Ω-1 cm2 mol-1

m = 23 = 1/ (ka x Λo2)

ka = 1/ (76.92)2 (23)

= 7.35 x10-6

 

Precaution steps:

1. Use distilled water to rinse the electrodes before use.

2. Shake the electrode briefly to ensure that no air bubbles trapped in electrode.

3. Ensure the electrode surface is completely submerged in solution.